Romania
Romania’s dementia response is constrained not by a lack of available treatments but by fragmentation across the entire care continuum, from diagnosis to long-term support. While protocolized access to core symptomatic Alzheimer’s disease medicines in place through universal coverage reimbursement frameworks, this pharmacological availability is not embedded within a coherent national dementia strategy that would standardize diagnostic pathways, follow-up, workforce planning, and integration between health and social care. Diagnostic capacity remains uneven, with limited use of advanced tools and long waiting times in the public system, while biomarkers and innovative diagnostics remain largely research-based. At the same time, Romania’s high out-of-pocket spending exposes families to substantial costs for private consultations, imaging, medicines, and residential or home-based support. Together, these structural and financial constraints push many households toward private or informal solutions, amplifying regional and socioeconomic inequalities despite the formal existence of insured treatment pathways.

AD Rating
Diagnostic Pathway
Specialized Care
Caregiver Support
National Policies
Access to ATT-s
Highlights
Population
Median age
Health expenditure (% of GDP)
Diagnosis
Diagnosis
Show moreDementia evaluation follows a general practitioner to specialist pathway, utilising validated Romanian versions of the MMSE and MoCA for cognitive screenings adjusted for age and education. Specialist structural neuroimaging via CT and MRI is standard but limited by public system quotas and regional backlogs. Functional PET scans, genetic risk factor tracking, and fluid cerebrospinal biomarkers are entirely unstandardised and confined to academic research settings. High out-of-pocket costs serve as a massive barrier, forcing families to finance private diagnostic services independently.

Diagnosis pathway
Most people living with emerging cognitive concerns enter the system through primary care, where general practitioners act as gatekeepers by recognising symptoms, performing basic assessments, and referring patients to specialists. Existing diagnostic guidelines do not fully reflect modern biomarker frameworks. Larger urban centres often shorten or bypass primary care through direct access to specialised hospital-based services like the National Institute of Geriatrie and Gerontology Ana Aslan. Families also turn to parallel private routes or memory clinics for quicker assessments, which are financed entirely out of pocket and remain unevenly accessible.
Romania has diagnostic and treatment guidelines for dementia, although they are not particularly recent and do not appear to have been updated to fully reflect the latest biomarker-based Alzheimer’s frameworks used in some other European countries. In Romania, most people living with emerging cognitive concerns enter the system through primary care, where general practitioners (GPs) play a gatekeeping role by recognising symptoms, initiating basic assessments, and referring onward to neurology, psychiatry, or geriatrics for diagnostic confirmation and management.9 Evidence from Romanian primary care research indicates that GPs are already involved in dementia care and are actively discussing an expanded role in ongoing management, reinforcing a GP to a specialist pathway as the dominant model in practice. In larger urban centers, pathways may bypass or shorten primary care through direct access to specialized hospital-based services, particularly geriatric and neurology centers such as Institutul Național de Geriatrie și Gerontologie Ana Aslan, which provides outpatient consultations and day-hospital services focused on ageing-related conditions. Alongside the public system, some families pursue parallel private routes, including dementia or memory-focused clinics, to obtain faster assessments or second opinions; these options are typically financed entirely out of pocket and are therefore unevenly accessible.
Wait times
Romania experiences persistent access pressure across the health system. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and European Observatory reporting highlights that a notable share of the population reports unmet medical needs due to cost, distance, or waiting times, with clear socioeconomic and regional inequities. Dementia-specific national wait time benchmarks for neurology consultations or computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are not consistently published in open official sources. These pressures often push families toward private diagnostics when they can afford them.
Diagnosis cost
Romania’s mandatory public health insurance system under the National Health Insurance House provides universal coverage but lacks comprehensive funding for dementia diagnostics. Out-of-pocket spending is high by European standards, accounting for 21 percent of health expenditure in 2021 and 23 percent in 2023, heavily driven by pharmaceuticals and diagnostics. Families routinely face significant costs to bypass public waiting times, paying privately for specialist consultations, neuroimaging, and fully self-financing advanced testing like genetic or biomarker analyses. Consequently, the speed and quality of diagnosis are closely linked to financial capacity.
Romania has a mandatory public health insurance system overseen by the National Health Insurance House (CNAS), funded through payroll contributions. It provides universal coverage for residents, including primary, inpatient, and emergency care, though services often require, or are complemented by, private care and out-of-pocket payments, particularly for dental and specialized services. Romania also has a high out-of-pocket burden by EU standards, which directly shapes access to dementia diagnosis and early management. OECD and European Observatory data indicate that out-of-pocket spending accounted for around 21% of total health expenditure in 2021, placing Romania among the higher out-of-pocket systems in the European Union. More recent European Commission country health profiles suggest that this share rose further to approximately 23% in 2023, with household spending driven in particular by outpatient pharmaceuticals, dental care, and privately accessed diagnostic services. In practice, this means that while a basic diagnostic pathway is formally available through the public system, families frequently incur significant household costs when attempting to obtain timely assessment. These costs typically arise from the use of private GP or specialist consultations to bypass waiting times, out-of-pocket payment for faster CT or MRI imaging, partial or full payment for medicines, and near-total self-financing of advanced diagnostics such as genetic testing or biomarker analyses. As a result, the effective quality and speed of dementia diagnosis in Romania are closely linked to patients’ financial capacity, reinforcing inequalities in access despite nominal universal coverage.
Cognitive tests
The Romanian versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are used and validated tools for detecting cognitive impairment in clinical practice, forming the backbone of initial cognitive assessment in both specialist and, in some settings, primary care. The MoCA is consistently regarded as more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment and early-stage dementia than the MMSE, largely because it places greater emphasis on executive functions, attention, visuospatial abilities, and complex language tasks, which are often affected early in the disease course. Standard cut-off values commonly applied in Romania are ≤ 25 for MoCA and < 26 for MMSE, but in practice these thresholds are adjusted for educational attainment, age, and cultural context to reduce false positives or negatives. The MoCA’s broader cognitive domain coverage allows for a more nuanced characterization of cognitive profiles, particularly in highly educated individuals or in cases where memory complaints are subtle, making it especially useful for early detection and longitudinal follow-up. In contrast, the MMSE remains valuable for global cognitive staging, monitoring progression, and communicating severity, but is less sensitive to early executive and attentional deficits, reinforcing the complementary rather than interchangeable role of these two instruments in Romanian dementia assessment pathways.
Imaging tests
Structural neuroimaging is a standard component of dementia assessment in Romania once people reach specialist care. CT and MRI are routinely used to exclude secondary causes of cognitive decline (tumors, cerebrovascular disease, normal-pressure hydrocephalus) and to support differential diagnosis between dementia subtypes. In the public system, these tests are formally covered by national health insurance but are subject to capacity limits, referral quotas, and waiting lists, particularly outside major urban centers. As a result, non-urgent outpatient CT or MRI often involves significant delays, leading some families to seek faster access through private imaging providers, fully out-of-pocket. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET or amyloid PET) is not part of routine dementia diagnostics and is largely confined to exceptional academic or research contexts.
Genetic tests
Genetic testing is not part of the standard dementia diagnostic pathway in Romania. Testing for apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 status or for monogenic forms of dementia (e.g. PSEN1, PSEN2, APP) is not described in national clinical or policy sources as a routine practice. When genetic tests are used, they are generally limited to rare early onset or familial cases, typically initiated by specialists in academic centers or accessed through private laboratories. Such testing is almost entirely out-of-pocket, with no systematic reimbursement, and there is limited evidence of structured genetic counseling being integrated into dementia care services.
Biomarker tests
There is no evidence that suggests dementia biomarker use in Romania. CSF biomarkers such as amyloid-β, total tau and phosphorylated tau do not appear to be incorporated into a diagnostic pathway and are likely concentrated in specialised neurology centres, academic hospitals and research settings. Publicly available documentation does not indicate routine nationwide reimbursement or widespread availability. Likewise, no evidence was identified that blood-based Alzheimer biomarkers have been adopted into routine clinical practice within the Romanian health system. Further country-specific data are needed to clarify patterns of funding and access.
Cognitive Tests
Cognitive Tests
The Romanian versions of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) are used and validated tools for detecting cognitive impairment in clinical practice, forming the backbone of initial cognitive assessment in both specialist and, in some settings, primary care. The MoCA is consistently regarded as more sensitive to mild cognitive impairment and early-stage dementia than the MMSE, largely because it places greater emphasis on executive functions, attention, visuospatial abilities, and complex language tasks, which are often affected early in the disease course. Standard cut-off values commonly applied in Romania are ≤ 25 for MoCA and < 26 for MMSE, but in practice these thresholds are adjusted for educational attainment, age, and cultural context to reduce false positives or negatives. The MoCA’s broader cognitive domain coverage allows for a more nuanced characterization of cognitive profiles, particularly in highly educated individuals or in cases where memory complaints are subtle, making it especially useful for early detection and longitudinal follow-up. In contrast, the MMSE remains valuable for global cognitive staging, monitoring progression, and communicating severity, but is less sensitive to early executive and attentional deficits, reinforcing the complementary rather than interchangeable role of these two instruments in Romanian dementia assessment pathways.
Imaging Tests
Imaging Tests
Structural neuroimaging is a standard component of dementia assessment in Romania once people reach specialist care. CT and MRI are routinely used to exclude secondary causes of cognitive decline (tumors, cerebrovascular disease, normal-pressure hydrocephalus) and to support differential diagnosis between dementia subtypes. In the public system, these tests are formally covered by national health insurance but are subject to capacity limits, referral quotas, and waiting lists, particularly outside major urban centers. As a result, non-urgent outpatient CT or MRI often involves significant delays, leading some families to seek faster access through private imaging providers, fully out-of-pocket. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging (fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET or amyloid PET) is not part of routine dementia diagnostics and is largely confined to exceptional academic or research contexts.
Genetic Tests
Genetic Tests
Genetic testing is not part of the standard dementia diagnostic pathway in Romania. Testing for apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 status or for monogenic forms of dementia (e.g. PSEN1, PSEN2, APP) is not described in national clinical or policy sources as a routine practice. When genetic tests are used, they are generally limited to rare early onset or familial cases, typically initiated by specialists in academic centers or accessed through private laboratories. Such testing is almost entirely out-of-pocket, with no systematic reimbursement, and there is limited evidence of structured genetic counseling being integrated into dementia care services.
Biomarker Tests
Biomarker Tests
There is no evidence that suggests dementia biomarker use in Romania. CSF biomarkers such as amyloid-β, total tau and phosphorylated tau do not appear to be incorporated into a diagnostic pathway and are likely concentrated in specialised neurology centres, academic hospitals and research settings. Publicly available documentation does not indicate routine nationwide reimbursement or widespread availability. Likewise, no evidence was identified that blood-based Alzheimer biomarkers have been adopted into routine clinical practice within the Romanian health system. Further country-specific data are needed to clarify patterns of funding and access.
Treatment & Care
Treatment & care
Show moreRomania’s specialist model is fragmented across urban hospital neurology, psychiatry, and geriatric departments, including the Ana Aslan National Institute. Standard medicines like donepezil, memantine, rivastigmine, and galantamine are reimbursed under specific protocols. However, families face severe geographic disparities and high out-of-pocket spending on consultations, transport, and unlisted drugs. Long-term state provisions are absent, forcing reliance on informal networks and non-governmental organisations like the Romanian Alzheimer Society for carer education and group support. Palliative care capacity varies heavily by region.
Specialized facilities and services
Romania lacks a documented national network of memory clinics, delivering care through a fragmented specialist model centered on hospital-based neurology, psychiatry, and geriatrics departments. The National Institute of Geriatrie and Gerontology Ana Aslan functions as a key reference centre. Specialist capacity is heavily concentrated in major cities like Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, Iasi, and Timisoara, leaving rural populations reliant on general outpatient clinics with minimal dementia focus. Private urban clinics offer alternative disorder assessments and shorter waiting times entirely out of pocket.
Romania does not have a clearly documented national network of memory clinics embedded in official policy or service-mapping documents. Instead, dementia care is delivered through a fragmented specialist model, centered on hospital-based neurology, psychiatry, and geriatrics departments, as well as through national-level specialist institutes. An example is the Institutul Național de Geriatrie și Gerontologie „Ana Aslan”, which provides outpatient, day-hospital, and inpatient geriatrics and gerontology services and functions as a reference center. In practice, access to specialist dementia care is geographically uneven. Large cities such as Bucharest, Cluj-Napoca, Iași, and Timișoara concentrate specialist capacity, while smaller towns and rural areas rely more heavily on referral to general hospitals or outpatient neurology or psychiatry clinics with limited dementia-specific focus. Alongside public services, private clinics in major urban centers offer dementia and memory disorder assessments, follow-up, and care coordination, typically with shorter waiting times but entirely out-of-pocket.
Approved medication
| Generic Name | Trade Name | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| Donepezil | Aricept, Aricept ODT, Adlarity, Eranz, Memac, Alzepil, Davia, Donecept, Donep, Donepex, Donesyn, Dopezil, Yasnal, Memorit, Pezale, Redumas, Zolpezil, Namzaric* | Donepezil is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s dementia. |
| Rivastigmine | Exelon, Exelon Patch, Prometax, Rivastach, Nimvastid | Symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe Alzheimer’s dementia. Symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe dementia in patients with idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. |
| Galantamine | Razadyne, Razadyne ER, Reminyl, Reminyl XL, Nivalin, Lycoremine, Galsya | Galantamine is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderately severe dementia of the Alzheimer type. |
| Memantine | Namenda, Namenda XR, Ebixa, Memary, Axura, Akatinol, Maruxa, Nemdatine, Namzaric* | Treatment of adult patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer’s disease. |
*Namzaric = combination of Donepezil and Memantine
Treatment cost
Treatment costs in Romania vary significantly depending on whether people remain within insured pathways or rely on private care and purchasing. Medicines such as donepezil and memantine are partially or fully reimbursed when prescribed under CNAS protocols, reducing direct medication costs for insured patients. ATTs are not covered. However, households often incur additional expenses related to specialist consultations, monitoring visits, diagnostic reassessments, and non-reimbursed medicines. Given Romania’s structurally high out-of-pocket spending, many families still experience meaningful financial exposure over the course of treatment, particularly when public-sector access is delayed or fragmented. Costs accumulate not only from medicines but also from transport to urban centers, repeated consultations, and privately financed support services, creating cumulative economic costs over time.

Caregiver support
Carer support in Romania relies heavily on non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and informal networks, rather than being systematically embedded in public health and social care pathways. The Romanian Alzheimer Society is an established national actor and a member of Alzheimer’s Disease International (ADI), providing awareness activities, carer education, support groups, and advocacy. Practical carer guidance materials in Romania consistently emphasize the importance of peer support, NGO-led counseling, and informal group formation as coping mechanisms for families managing dementia at home. While these supports play a critical role in mitigating carer challenges, their reach depends on local initiative and awareness rather than guaranteed service provision, resulting in uneven coverage and reliance on family resilience rather than structured state-backed caregiver programs.
Policy
Policy
Show moreRomania completely lacks an active national strategy or standalone plan for dementia. Regulatory frameworks are fragmented across generic mental health, disability, and social assistance laws that fail to address progressive cognitive decline, standardise diagnostic pathways, or mandate integrated healthcare coordination. Entitlements rely entirely on static disability certification or old-age thresholds, leaving early-onset conditions uncovered. Culturally, dementia is dismissed as an inevitable consequence of normal ageing, normalising a complete reliance on unsupported family care.
National dementia plan
Romania does not currently have a national dementia strategy.
Upcoming plans
No national strategies have been announced in Romania.
Policy gaps
Legal barriers
Romania lacks a dedicated dementia law, forcing reliance on generic health frameworks. Mental health legislation focuses on acute psychiatric care and involuntary hospitalisation, failing to address long-term care coordination or neurodegenerative disease progression. Social assistance laws group needs under broad headings like elderly or disabled, making service access dependent on local administrative interpretation or old-age thresholds rather than clinical diagnosis. Disability laws focus on static status rather than cognitive decline, offering limited guidance on advance care planning, legal representation, or systematic caregiver support.
Romania does have several relevant legal frameworks that indirectly apply to dementia, but none provide a dedicated, dementia-specific legal basis. The core mental health legislation, Law no. 487/2002 on Mental Health and the Protection of Persons with Mental Disorders, is primarily designed to regulate psychiatric care, involuntary hospitalization, consent, and patient rights in acute or severe mental illness. While people living with dementia may fall under its scope in advanced stages, the law does not address dementia as a progressive neurodegenerative condition, nor does it define diagnostic pathways, long-term follow-up, or coordination between medical and social services.
From a social care perspective, Law no. 292/2011 on Social Assistance and related secondary legislation regulate access to social services, home care, and residential facilities for vulnerable groups. These frameworks are structured around broad categories such as “elderly persons,” “persons with disabilities,” or “dependent persons,” but they do not recognize dementia as a distinct condition with evolving needs. As a result, access to services depends on age thresholds, disability certification, or local administrative interpretation rather than on clinical dementia diagnosis.
Disability-related protections are governed by Law no. 448/2006 on the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, which can apply to people living with dementia once functional impairment is formally recognized. However, the law focuses on disability status rather than disease trajectory and offers limited guidance on early-stage dementia, carer rights, cognitive decline, or decision-making capacity over time. This creates gaps in areas such as advance care planning, legal representation, and transitional care.
Critically, none of these laws mandate integrated health social care pathways, standardized dementia diagnostics, workforce planning for dementia expertise, or systematic carer support. Early-onset dementia, in particular, remains poorly covered, as many services are legally tied to old-age thresholds. In the absence of a dedicated dementia law or a binding national dementia strategy, Romania’s legal framework remains fragmented, relying on partial applicability of mental health, disability, and social assistance laws that were not designed to address the full continuum of dementia care.
- https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/romania/75-mental-health
- https://national-policies.eacea.ec.europa.eu/youthwiki/chapters/romania/4-social-inclusion
- https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/wp-content/uploads/sites/15/2019/11/Romania_Law-no.-4482006-Regarding-the-Protection-and-Promotion-of-the-Rights-of-Disabled-Persons.pdf
Cultural barriers
Dementia is often perceived as a private family matter or an inevitable consequence of normal ageing rather than a public health priority. This mindset delays help-seeking and leads to pervasive under-diagnosis as families rely exclusively on informal care networks without external guidance. Pervasive social stigma surrounding cognitive and mental decline limits open discussion and deters early system engagement. Households frequently postpone professional assessment until functional impairments become severe, weakening bottom-up demand for systemic health reforms and reducing political pressure for meaningful legislative changes.
Cultural factors further constrain dementia policy development and implementation. Dementia in Romania is still sometimes perceived as a private family matter or an inevitable part of ageing, rather than as a public health and social care priority requiring collective response. This framing contributes to delayed help seeking, under diagnosis, and reliance on informal family care, often without adequate support or guidance. Stigma around cognitive decline and mental illness also limits open discussion and early engagement with services. Families may postpone seeking diagnosis until functional impairment becomes severe, reducing the window for timely intervention and planning. These cultural barriers weaken bottom-up demand for services and reduce political pressure for comprehensive reform, reinforcing the policy inertia created by legal and institutional gaps.
Research
Research
Show moreDementia research is supported across prominent medical faculties, including Carol Davila, Titu Maiorescu, Craiova, Iuliu Hatieganu, Brasov, and Constanta universities. Interventional clinical drug trials are authorized and supervised nationally by the National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices and recorded on the European CTIS database. Non-pharmacological innovation focuses on digital tools, including the CareUp digital skills project for carers and the interactive POSTHCARD caregiving simulation game. Biomedically, the ALZNEKIN project pioneered collaborative French-Romanian research into novel imidazothiadiazole kinase inhibitors.
Selected academic institutions
Clinical trials and registries
The regulatory authority responsible for approving and overseeing all clinical trials is the National Agency for Medicines and Medical Devices of Romania (NAMMDR / ANMDMR). As Romania is an EU member state, all authorised interventional trials are also registered and searchable on the centralised European CTIS public database.

Selected innovative methods
At the 2025 Alzheimer’s National Conference, the CareUp project was highlighted for expanding carers’ digital skills through international partnerships. In 2015, tech startup Father collaborated with European universities to develop POSTHCARD, a simulation game designed to train family caregivers in practical coping skills within a safe digital environment. Biomedically, the ALZNEKIN collaborative research project targeted neuroinflammation and tau hyperphosphorylation by designing novel imidazothiadiazole compounds to inhibit specific kinases, strengthening long-term scientific cooperation between Romanian and French teams.
At the Alzheimer’s National Conference in Romania held from 3-6 June 2025 at the World Trade Center Bucharest, the CareUp project was presented as part of Session XII: European Projects and Innovative Solutions in Elderly Care. A representative of local life-long learning NGO, Asociația Habilitas, outlined CareUp’s objectives, European partnership, funding framework, timeline, and expected results, highlighting its focus on strengthening carers’ digital skills and capacity across Europe. The conference brought together 429 participants from diverse professional backgrounds, serving as a major platform for knowledge exchange and networking in dementia care and social innovation. During the event, Asociația Habilitas received a Partnership Diploma from Romanian Alzheimer Society, recognizing its long-standing contribution to professional training and support for older adults and their families, while CareUp used the occasion to promote innovation, lifelong learning, and digital solutions for carers.
A Romanian tech startup, Father, joined an international, university-led consortium from Switzerland and the Netherlands to develop POSTHCARD, a simulation game designed to support home-based care for people living with Alzheimer’s disease. Launched by brothers Frederik-Samujel and Erik Daniel Nistor in 2015, Father contributed to building an interactive, story-driven simulator that recreates everyday challenges faced by families caring for a relative living with Alzheimer’s disease. The project’s goal is to help carers learn practical coping and care skills in a realistic but safe environment. At the time of reporting, POSTHCARD was scheduled to enter its testing phase the following year, with a planned public launch in 2020, reflecting growing interest in digital, experiential tools for dementia care education and support.
The ALZNEKIN project (Innovative strategy for Alzheimer disease: targeting neuroinflammation and DYRK/CLK kinases) was a Romanian–French collaborative research project funded by UEFISCDI under the PN-III-PM Programme, implemented between May 2017 and December 2018. The project aimed to develop an innovative therapeutic strategy for Alzheimer’s disease. Its scientific focus was on targeting neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and tau hyperphosphorylation by designing novel imidazothiadiazole compounds capable of inhibiting the kinases DYRK1A and CLK1, which are implicated in neurofibrillary tangle formation. The compounds were physicochemically and biologically characterized for kinase inhibition, antioxidant, and anti-inflammatory effects. Beyond its biomedical objectives, the project also sought to strengthen long-term research collaboration between Romanian and French teams in neurodegenerative disease research.
Support
Support
Show moreGrassroots assistance is spearheaded by foundations like Smiles, Margareta of Romania, and the Romanian Alzheimer Society. Prominent initiatives include the 15th National Alzheimer’s Conference addressing medical priorities, and the Erasmus+ AGE_THEA participatory theatre project to mitigate elderly isolation. The Royal Foundation introduced the nation’s first helpline for older adults. Furthermore, the Smiles Foundation created the Tileagd Assisted Living facility for early-onset cases, while the Alice House project advocates for high-quality retirement residences. No dedicated media outlets exist.
Selected national associations, patient family associations, NGOs:
Selected initiatives
The 15th National Alzheimer’s Conference in 2025 focused on prevention and a national dementia plan. The Romanian Alzheimer Society participates in the transnational Erasmus+ AGE_THEA theatre project to combat older adult isolation. The Margareta of Romania Royal Foundation launched the nation’s first helpline for older adults to address loneliness and deliver social service referrals. To bridge institutional gaps, the Smiles Foundation established the Tileagd Assisted Living facility for adults under 65 with early-onset dementia or chronic disabilities. Additionally, the Alice House project seeks funding for high-quality dependent senior residences.
The 15th National Alzheimer’s Conference in Romania (CNAlz2025)
Erasmus+ project
The Margareta of Romania Royal Foundation activities
Tileagd Assisted Living
The Alice House project
- https://comfortage.eu/comfortage-showcased-in-cnalz2025-romanian-healthcare-professionals-love-it/
- https://www.alzheimer-europe.org/news/romanian-alzheimer-society-gives-us-update-their-initiatives-promoting-active-ageing-older?language_content_entity=en
- https://www.stiripesurse.ro/margareta-of-romania-royal-foundation-nearly-11700-calls-to-telefonul-varstnicului-in-2025-supporting-5769-seniors_3850786
- https://www.thesmilesfoundation.org/project/tal-tileagd-assisted-living/
- https://fundatia1si1.ro/en/new-projects/the-alice-house-project-old-people-s-homes
Dedicated media outlets
No dementia-only dedicated media outlet is clearly identified in the main policy and country sources. Information dissemination occurs primarily through NGO websites and social media, professional conferences and medical education events, and broader public health messaging. As a result, sustained public visibility of dementia issues depends on episodic campaigns rather than continuous, specialized media coverage.



